Current:Home > reviewsKate, Princess of Wales, apologizes for altering family photo that fueled rumors about her health -GrowthInsight
Kate, Princess of Wales, apologizes for altering family photo that fueled rumors about her health
View
Date:2025-04-13 16:32:15
LONDON (AP) — Kate, Princess of Wales, apologized Monday for “confusion” caused by her altering of a family photo released by the palace — an image of Kate and her children that was intended to calm concern and speculation about the British royal’s health, but had the opposite effect.
Several news agencies that initially published the photo, including The Associated Press, withdrew the image over concerns about digital manipulation. Issued by the couple’s Kensington Palace office on Sunday to mark Mother’s Day in Britain, it was the first official photo of 42-year-old Kate since she had abdominal surgery nearly two months ago.
The retractions sent the online rumor mill, already rampant with speculation over Kate’s operation and recuperation, into overdrive. The PR disaster is more evidence that the royal family’s long-held mantra — “never complain, never explain” — is impossible in a social media-saturated era.
In a post on social media, Kate said that “like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing.”
“I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused,” the post said.
In the past, the palace has issued several of Kate’s family snapshots featuring her and heir to the throne, Prince William, with their children Prince George, 10, Princess Charlotte, 8, and Prince Louis, 5.
The latest photo was taken by William, Kensington Palace said. In an accompanying social media message, Kate said: “Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months. Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day.”
While there was no suggestion the photo was fake, AP retracted it because closer inspection revealed the source had manipulated the image in a way that did not meet AP’s photo standards. For instance, it contained an inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand with the sleeve of her sweater.
Other major news agencies, including Getty, Reuters, AFP and the U.K. national agency, PA, also withdrew the photo.
Kensington Palace said it would not release the original unedited photograph. And while Kate’s statement provided a measure of clarification, it looked unlikely to stop the swirl of rumor that has accelerated during her absence from public duties.
Former BBC royal correspondent Peter Hunt said the mishandled photo release “is damaging for the royals.”
“They knew there would be intense interest in any picture they released of Kate,” he wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter. “Their challenge is that people will now question whether they can be trusted and believed when they next issue a health update.”
The royal family is under particular scrutiny because King Charles III has also had to cancel public duties while he undergoes treatment for an unspecified form of cancer. The monarch has canceled all his public engagements, though he has been photographed walking to church and meeting privately with government officials and dignitaries.
Charles’ relative openness about his diagnosis was a departure for the generally secretive royal family. But it has been eclipsed in popular interest by curiosity over Kate’s condition. In the absence of firm information, conspiracy theories have rushed to fill the vacuum.
The release of the photo followed weeks of gossip on social media about what had happened to Kate since she left a hospital Jan. 29 after a nearly two-week stay following planned surgery. She hadn’t been seen publicly since Christmas Day.
Kate underwent surgery Jan. 16 and her condition and the reason for the operation have not been revealed, though Kensington Palace said it was not cancer-related.
Although the palace initially said that it would only provide significant updates and that she would not return to royal duties before Easter — March 31 this year — it followed up with a statement last month saying she was doing well.
At the time, royal aides told The Sun newspaper: “We’ve seen the madness of social media and that is not going to change our strategy. There has been much on social media but the princess has a right to privacy and asks the public to respect that.”
Further questions were raised last week when the British military seemed to jump the gun in announcing Kate would attend a Trooping the Color ceremony in June, apparently without consulting palace officials.
It’s up to palace officials, not government departments, to announce the royals’ attendance at events. Kensington Palace didn’t confirm any scheduled public events for Kate, and the army later removed reference to her attendance.
William, Queen Camilla and other senior royals attended a Commonwealth Day service at Westminster Abbey on Monday. Neither Kate nor the king was due to be at the event, which drew a crowd of several dozen anti-monarchist protesters holding signs reading “Down with the Crown.”
William was also due to speak at an event for the Earthshot Prize, an environmental competition that he founded.
Veteran public relations consultant Mark Borkowski said the photo gaffe exposed a wider PR problem for the monarchy.
“There doesn’t seem to be that much joined-up strategic thinking at the heart of the royal family at the moment, which leads to these problems where it’s a very difficult organization to manage in terms of PR,” he said.
“I find they have risen to the challenge, provided the statement as an explanation,” he said of Kate’s apology Monday. “The question is, with all the conspiracy theories running around, is whether people believe it. And I’m not sure that they will.”
veryGood! (5641)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Prosecutor tells jury that self-exiled wealthy Chinese businessman cheated thousands of $1 billion
- What is clear-air turbulence? What to know about the very violent phenomenon
- A British neonatal nurse convicted of killing 7 babies loses her bid to appeal
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- With Paris Olympics looming, new coach Emma Hayes brings the swagger back to USWNT
- Kentucky awards contract to replace unemployment insurance system that struggled during the pandemic
- North Carolina judge properly considered jurors’ request in murder trial, justices decide
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Rodeo Star Spencer Wright's 3-Year-Old Son Wakes Up After Toy Tractor Accident
Ranking
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- See memorials in Uvalde and across Texas that honor victims of Robb Elementary shooting
- Workers at Georgia school bus maker Blue Bird approve their first union contract
- North Carolina judge properly considered jurors’ request in murder trial, justices decide
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Beauty Queen Killer Christopher Wilder's Survivor Tina Marie Risico Speaks Out 40 Years Later
- NCAA, leagues sign off on nearly $3 billion plan to set stage for dramatic change across college sports
- The Uvalde school shooting thrust them into the national spotlight. Where are they now?
Recommendation
Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
Real Housewives of Atlanta' Kandi Burruss Shares a Hack for Lasting Makeup & Wedding Must-Haves
You'll Be Stuck On New Parents Sofia Richie and Elliot Grainge's Love Story
Sean Diddy Combs accused of sexually abusing and drugging NYC college student in 1990s, lawsuit says
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
What is the 'best' children's book? Kids, parents and authors on why some rise to the top
U.K. review reveals death toll at little-known Nazi camp on British soil
Coast Guard suspends search for two French sailors after cargo schooner sinks